Delhi High Court held that principle enunciated in the criminal jurisprudence in respect of a ‘proof beyond reasonable doubt’ was erroneously applied to section 148 of the Income Tax Act. Thus, order ...

In a criminal case, the prosecution has the burden of proving that the defendant is guilty beyond all reasonable doubt. This means that the prosecution must convince the jury that there is no ...

High profile lawyer Mark Hunter has an impeccable record putting criminals behind bars and is a shoe-in for governor in the upcoming election. But when ambitious rookie journalist, C.J. Nicholas ...

Georgia is the only state that requires individuals to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they have an intellectual ...

You’ll have to listen to the podcast to find out all the twists and turns in ... However, I’m convinced after you start listening to Beyond Reasonable Doubt?, you too will be discussing ...

Who wanted them dead and why? Aarushi - Beyond Reasonable Doubt, the feature length version of a televised episodic series, reopens the 8 year long Aarushi Case Diaries.

Kite said she does not at all believe that Gardner was at the ... Kite wrote in an order that there is evidence beyond a ...

All forensic evidence must be intelligible ... to exactly the same standard of proof as other forms of evidence: proof beyond reasonable doubt. Previous miscarriages of justice have highlighted ...

The balance of probabilities standard of proof has been used in all disciplinary proceedings ... "Guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt before an inmate can be sentenced to segregation ...

In writing in her column headlined "Why Defamation Should Not be a Crime" (The Sunday Times of April 28), Kishali Pinto Jayawardena is mistaken in her belief that the Canadian Law Reform Commission of ...