A pipeline company’s lawsuit against the environmental group could chill free speech, experts said. First Amendment issues ...
Greenpeace’s 2016 and 2017 protest campaign against Energy Transfer’s Dakota Access Pipeline was one of the group’s most ...
Experts called the verdict “beyond punitive.” The organization plans to appeal and has already filed a countersuit in Europe.
Court order forcing Greenpeace to pay $660m over pipeline protests will have 'chilling' impact on free speech, campaigners ...
A column by Winona LaDuke, an Ojibwe writer and economist on Minnesota’s White Earth Reservation. She also is co-curator of ...
9don MSNOpinion
If the verdict stands, Greenpeace will have to pay $667 million in damages to Energy Transfer, which built and owns the ...
This week, a jury in North Dakota found Greenpeace liable for more than $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company behind the Dakota Access Pipeline. It was a monumental verdict that ...
A North Dakota jury finds the group defamed Energy Transfer LP.
Greenpeace vowed to appeal a North Dakota jury's ruling forcing it to pay $660 million in damages for its protest efforts ...
How SLAPP lawsuits like the one by Energy Transfer against Greenpeace for protesting the Dakota Access Pipeline will impact ...
Energy Transfer, one of the largest pipeline companies ... The jury agreed and ordered Greenpeace to pay $667 million in damages. Greenpeace, which had said it would have to declare bankruptcy ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results