What Marbury v. Madison means for the Supreme Court — and America
President Donald Trump has been critical of federal judges who've moved to block some of his most contentious actions, such ...
Hoodline53m
Attorneys General Unite Against Vice President's Judicial Review Remarks, Vow to Uphold Constitutional Checks and Balances
Attorneys general from 18 states denounced Vice President Vance's comments on judicial review, affirming the judiciary's ...
Reporter-Herald2d
Judge clears way for Trump’s plan to downsize federal workforce with deferred resignation program
A federal judge on Wednesday cleared the way for President Donald Trump’s plan to downsize the federal workforce with a ...
Money & the Law: Long-ago decision reflects tensions between government's branches
Since we are now at a time when the power of the president, Congress and the courts are in tension and generating legal ...
Augusta Free Press15h
Group of Democrat AGs tell JD Vance: ‘No one is above the law’
A group of 17 Democratic state AGs has a strong message for Vice President JD Vance: “Judges stop the unlawful and ...
AL DA News1d
Sonia Sotomayor: "the president is not an emperor"
The first Latina judge to serve on the Supreme Court of Justice is clear about the limits of executive power. A reminder for ...
WPSD Local 62d
Trump administration challenges judicial checks as local judges explain court authority
Local retired judges and attorneys spoke Wednesday to clarify how the U.S. government works. Attorney Mark Bryant and former ...
Washington Monthly4d
Marbury v. Madison
Doomscrolling scenarios like a Trump third term won’t happen. But what if this administration defies court orders?
The Messenger2d
How Marbury v. Madison established the courts' power to review the law
WASHINGTON — When it comes to respecting the rulings of courts, President Donald Trump has been of two minds. If the decision goes his way, as it did when the Supreme Court ruled 11 months ago that ...