Health care organizations working with marketers, independent sales representatives, advertising, and other consulting support to promote sales ...

An Arizona jury has found Lori Vallow Daybell conspired with her brother to murder her husband, Charles Vallow, returning a guilty verdict after about three hours of deliberation.

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or ...

Whether you own the original Switch or are looking ahead to what will release on the Switch 2, here are all the new Switch games we can look forward to in 2025 and beyond. Take a look at our guide ...

Last month, the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) collective reported that dark energy is evolving—specifically weakening—and it could help provide the first observational evidence ...

The entire edifice of American justice is built on the conviction that there is no guilt without proof beyond reasonable doubt — and that there is no unimportant person, at least not in the eyes ...

Richard Shotwell/Invision/AP Lawyers for Sean “Diddy” Combs are asking a judge not to allow prosecutors to introduce potential evidence ... to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt,” the ...

there is current[ly] insufficient evidence to prove that charge to the exacting standard of beyond reasonable doubt. “Police continue to monitor anti-queer and anti-trans sentiment for the ...

The High Court sitting in Apac district has acquitted a man accused of murder, ruling that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond a ... defense results in reasonable doubt, which must benefit ...

The Post Office is pushing the government to give the benefit of the doubt to more than 1,000 former subpostmasters claiming compensation, where it hasn’t yet found evidence that Horizon errors ...

NEW DELHI: A local court has acquitted two men accused of sexually harassing a 17-year-old girl, saying there was no strong evidence ... proving its case beyond reasonable doubt.

What the McCarrick case revealed was that in the 1990s any allegation against a bishop would not be entertained unless a criminal level of proof beyond a reasonable doubt was readily at hand.