A new ruling is the third time a court has found that the Alphabet-owned company operates an illegal monopoly.

Use precise geolocation data and actively scan device characteristics for identification. This is done to store and access ...

Judge Brinkema’s ruling found Google “liable under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act” for its monopolistic behaviors in the ...

promoted products such as app ads, website clicks and conversions. To sustain and increase revenue, X said it must add new advertisers and encourage existing ones to increase the amount of inventory ...

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Google has been branded an abusive monopolist by a federal judge for the second time in less than a year ...

A US District Court has delivered a verdict in a major antitrust case, finding Google liable for monopolising the digital ad ...

A federal judge has ruled that Google ( GOOG, GOOGL) holds an illegal monopoly over the online advertising business, its ...

In-store shopping might be perceived as increasingly becoming a thing of the past, but Aussie professional haircare, salon, ...

A US judge on Thursday ruled that Google illegally wielded monopoly power in the online ad technology market, in a legal ...

Google illegally acted to preserve “monopoly power” in the ad-tech business, a federal judge ruled Thursday. It’s the second ...

The ruling involving Google's online ad technology follows a similar case last year in which Google's search engine was declared a monopoly.