News
The unanimous decision lowers barriers for employees to challenge retirement plan transactions under ERISA, resolving a ...
Cunningham v. Cornell University will not go into the history books as one of the most important 30 decisions of the 2024-25 term. The case involves a technical problem about pleading standards under ...
Workplace health or retirement plans that tap third-party service providers to deliver benefits are at high risk of having ...
On April 17, 2025, the Supreme Court decided Cunningham v. Cornell University, No. 23-1007, holding that a plaintiff may state ...
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Cornell employees challenging excessive 401(k) fees. Here’s what the ERISA decision means ...
In a unanimous decision, the nation’s highest court has made a clear delineation as to who bears the burden of proof in ERISA litigation — and it’s not likely to slow the current pace.
Notwithstanding its mounting backlog, the U.S. Supreme Court resolved only one case today, an unsurprising unanimous decision ...
The St. Louis law firm that's been taking on big universities and corporations over retirement plans just scored another ...
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday revived a class action by 28,000 Cornell University employees accusing the Ivy League ...
In a unanimous decision, the justices take a worker-friendly approach on behalf of 28,000 employees who accused the ...
September 2, 1974, Gerald Ford signed the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) into law. ERISA governs the ...
The nine justices reversed previous decisions by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, New York, and a U.S. federal district ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results