President Donald Trump is pursuing a path that is actively destabilizing the guardrails of our Constitution. Unless he ...

The dispute concerns efforts by the Department of Government Efficiency, largely led by Elon Musk, to access sensitive data, ...

All the Senate leadership has to do is to follow the process. This was what retired Supreme Court Associate Justice Adolfo ...

Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia’s lawyers accused the Trump administration of spending months “engaged in an elaborate, ...

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson questioned whether her colleagues are loosening its standards when intervening ...

Normally, Supreme Court justices are looked upon as a revered set of gruff, unsmiling, cold, and unreachable demigods loftily perched on Mount Olympus. The rare time they are seen in public is during ...

T HE EXECUTIVE order banning travel from 12 countries, which comes into effect on June 9th, is more methodical than previous ...

Former President Joe Biden attempted to add an amendment to the Constitution at a time when aides say he was in cognitive decline.

This essay analyzes Trump v. Anderson and Trump v. United States. It argues that, despite surface similarities—not least that they both helped smooth the path to Trump’s re-election as President—the ...

Affirmative efforts to reduce racial inequality — everything Trump dubs “illegal DEI” — remain legal and morally just ...

Maryland Democrat Sen. Chris Van Hollen reacted to reports that "Maryland Man" Kilmar Abrego Garcia has been returned to the ...

A slew of Supreme Court decisions this summer will have far-reaching consequences. NPR's Ayesha Rascoe speaks with Leah Litman, law professor at the University of Michigan, about what to expect.